<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Inviting Epiphany</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardminerich.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardminerich.com</link>
	<description>A programmer&#039;s chronicle of insights and discoveries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Road to Functional Programming in F# &#8211; From Imperative to Computation Expressions by Richard Minerich</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2011/02/the-road-to-functional-programming-in-f-from-imperative-to-computation-expressions/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Minerich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=542#comment-751</guid>
		<description>But as always it&#039;s a tradeoff.  Sequences have significant overhead when compared to a nice tail call recursive function.  IEnumerable will always require a mess of invocations to get even a single element, while a tail recursive function gets turned into a fast loop by the compiler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But as always it&#8217;s a tradeoff.  Sequences have significant overhead when compared to a nice tail call recursive function.  IEnumerable will always require a mess of invocations to get even a single element, while a tail recursive function gets turned into a fast loop by the compiler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Road to Functional Programming in F# &#8211; From Imperative to Computation Expressions by jf</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2011/02/the-road-to-functional-programming-in-f-from-imperative-to-computation-expressions/comment-page-1/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>jf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=542#comment-750</guid>
		<description>Just use the sequences - use fold to map over existing stuff and unfold to generate new stuff.  Forget about the tail call problem - the sequence takes care of it for you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just use the sequences &#8211; use fold to map over existing stuff and unfold to generate new stuff.  Forget about the tail call problem &#8211; the sequence takes care of it for you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Microsoft MVP means to me by Reading Notes 2012-04-23 &#124; Matricis</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2012/04/what-microsoft-mvp-means-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading Notes 2012-04-23 &#124; Matricis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=1023#comment-735</guid>
		<description>[...] What Microsoft MVP means to me &#171; Inviting Epiphany &#8211; I don&#039;t know if this post is the answer to the other one, but in my head this is more likely what is a real MVP. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Microsoft MVP means to me &laquo; Inviting Epiphany &#8211; I don&#039;t know if this post is the answer to the other one, but in my head this is more likely what is a real MVP. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Microsoft MVP means to me by nicolas</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2012/04/what-microsoft-mvp-means-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=1023#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Hi, thank you for this post, it is very interesting. as the rest of your blog, which is highly interesting.

The power of fsharp seem so intense and well fitted, that I wonder how shops built upon weaker langage will resist to new ventures built upon this. 

I came to fsharp when I saw they had type providers, which I thought of years. back then I thought that programming without it did not really make sense as their arrival would shift grounds so much. the current implementation of them is just a baby seed to a wider ecosystem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, thank you for this post, it is very interesting. as the rest of your blog, which is highly interesting.</p>
<p>The power of fsharp seem so intense and well fitted, that I wonder how shops built upon weaker langage will resist to new ventures built upon this. </p>
<p>I came to fsharp when I saw they had type providers, which I thought of years. back then I thought that programming without it did not really make sense as their arrival would shift grounds so much. the current implementation of them is just a baby seed to a wider ecosystem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why do most programmers work so hard at pretending that they&#8217;re not doing math? by Ted Darling</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2012/01/why-do-most-programmers-work-so-hard-at-pretending-that-theyre-not-doing-math/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=906#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Nice article and ideas, and though I agree that math is important to progrmmers, I will subit that it is for a differnt reason.

I&#039;ve been a programmer for many years and still do it all day every day with minimal use of standard math. So I can see why programmers say that they don&#039;t use math.

That said, basically every if statement used by a progrogrammer (please try to tell me you never use this) is indeed the use of Boolean Algebra. So yes, math is very much used daily with programming. I would say that most programmers just don&#039;t know it. I know taking a class Boolean Algebra changed very much the way I thought in implenting parts of my code (not always for the better when experimenting with implementing a simple or statement using NANDs). It did help me learn different ways to implement logic in different ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article and ideas, and though I agree that math is important to progrmmers, I will subit that it is for a differnt reason.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a programmer for many years and still do it all day every day with minimal use of standard math. So I can see why programmers say that they don&#8217;t use math.</p>
<p>That said, basically every if statement used by a progrogrammer (please try to tell me you never use this) is indeed the use of Boolean Algebra. So yes, math is very much used daily with programming. I would say that most programmers just don&#8217;t know it. I know taking a class Boolean Algebra changed very much the way I thought in implenting parts of my code (not always for the better when experimenting with implementing a simple or statement using NANDs). It did help me learn different ways to implement logic in different ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why do most programmers work so hard at pretending that they&#8217;re not doing math? by Nirvin M</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2012/01/why-do-most-programmers-work-so-hard-at-pretending-that-theyre-not-doing-math/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirvin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=906#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Programming is better than math.

i = i+1 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Programming is better than math.</p>
<p>i = i+1 :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Musicians, Mechanics, and Mathematicians by Shihab</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2012/01/mechanics-musicians-and-mathematicians/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Shihab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=933#comment-616</guid>
		<description>But the question still remains,  we start from scratch doing one thing at a time not all the three at a same period together, Modelling is important but at first you need to know how to build something ..i.e Get expert at your building tools than...You can learn Shapes to give whatever shape you want with your building tools ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the question still remains,  we start from scratch doing one thing at a time not all the three at a same period together, Modelling is important but at first you need to know how to build something ..i.e Get expert at your building tools than&#8230;You can learn Shapes to give whatever shape you want with your building tools ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Advice for Getting Started with F# by Real world F#: my experience (part two) &#124; Index Out Of Range</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2011/10/advice-for-getting-started-with-f/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Real world F#: my experience (part two) &#124; Index Out Of Range</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=875#comment-603</guid>
		<description>[...] Advice for getting started with F# by Richard Minerich An overview of functional programming by Dorian Corompt (recursion, lists, more to come…) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Advice for getting started with F# by Richard Minerich An overview of functional programming by Dorian Corompt (recursion, lists, more to come…) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why do most programmers work so hard at pretending that they&#8217;re not doing math? by Real world F#: my experience (part one) &#124; Index Out Of Range</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2012/01/why-do-most-programmers-work-so-hard-at-pretending-that-theyre-not-doing-math/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Real world F#: my experience (part one) &#124; Index Out Of Range</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=906#comment-602</guid>
		<description>[...] heartily agree with Richard Minerich when he says that testing does not replace a strong, theoretically-validated model. It’s the very same reason that pushed me to build most of this application’s engine on paper [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] heartily agree with Richard Minerich when he says that testing does not replace a strong, theoretically-validated model. It’s the very same reason that pushed me to build most of this application’s engine on paper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Musicians, Mechanics, and Mathematicians by OJ</title>
		<link>http://richardminerich.com/2012/01/mechanics-musicians-and-mathematicians/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>OJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 07:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardminerich.com/?p=933#comment-601</guid>
		<description>Nice post Richard. It certainly gets you thinking.

I think that most people would happily go through their lives not thinking about this stuff at all. Most people don&#039;t even realise that math has a relevance to music, nor do they have a clue at the engineering, modelling and math that goes on behind the scenes with something as &quot;simple&quot; as a screw, nut or wrench is produced.

Consumers are often mindless when it comes to this kind of thing.

Would I want to buy something that wasn&#039;t properly tested and modelled? Absolutely not. But I think the vast majority wouldn&#039;t think twice about it unless they knew that the models existed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Richard. It certainly gets you thinking.</p>
<p>I think that most people would happily go through their lives not thinking about this stuff at all. Most people don&#8217;t even realise that math has a relevance to music, nor do they have a clue at the engineering, modelling and math that goes on behind the scenes with something as &#8220;simple&#8221; as a screw, nut or wrench is produced.</p>
<p>Consumers are often mindless when it comes to this kind of thing.</p>
<p>Would I want to buy something that wasn&#8217;t properly tested and modelled? Absolutely not. But I think the vast majority wouldn&#8217;t think twice about it unless they knew that the models existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

